Re: [PATCH] no paravirt for X86_VOYAGER or X86_VISWS

Chris Wright
2006-12-09T21:41:16Z

* Randy Dunlap (randy.dunlap@oracle.com) wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>
> Since Voyager and Visual WS already define ARCH_SETUP,
> it looks like PARAVIRT shouldn't be offered for them.
>
> In file included from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:63:
> include/asm-i386/mach-visws/setup_arch.h:8:1: warning: "ARCH_SETUP" redefined
> In file included from include/asm/msr.h:5,
> from include/asm/processor.h:17,
> from include/asm/thread_info.h:16,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
> from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
> from include/linux/capability.h:45,
> from include/linux/sched.h:46,
> from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:26:
> include/asm/paravirt.h:163:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> In file included from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:63:
> include/asm-i386/mach-visws/setup_arch.h:8:1: warning: "ARCH_SETUP" redefined
> In file included from include/asm/msr.h:5,
> from include/asm/processor.h:17,
> from include/asm/thread_info.h:16,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
> from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
> from include/linux/capability.h:45,
> from include/linux/sched.h:46,
> from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:26:
> include/asm/paravirt.h:163:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>

Acked-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>