From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>, Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Bauke Jan Douma <bjdouma@xs4all.nl>,
Tomasz Koprowski <tomek@koprowski.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:00:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061210160053.GD10351@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165723779.334.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 04:09:39AM +0000, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 09:38 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Daniel Drake (1):
> > > PCI: VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
> >
> > Please drop this one, Alan isn't 100% on it and is working on getting a
> > better fix into mainline
> >
> > Daniel
>
> Sorry Daniel, I don't agree with you, this patch is a improvement of the
> original patch and in my opinion should go in.
> As Alan explain to us, is not the prefect one, but still be an
> improvement.
Below is the patch for going back to the 2.6.16.16 status quo that is in
2.6.16.36-rc1.
Does this cause any serious regression for anyone?
> Thanks,
> Sérgio M. B.
cu
Adrian
commit dcb1715778026c4aec20d186dc794245d9a1f5de
Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Date: Fri Dec 8 17:00:35 2006 +0100
revert the quirk_via_irq changes
This patch reverts the quirk_via_irq changes in 2.6.16.17 that
caused regressions for several people.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index a1cdf06..2a66e39 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -656,13 +656,7 @@ static void quirk_via_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, new_irq);
}
}
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_0, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_2, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_3, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_4, quirk_via_irq);
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_5, quirk_via_irq);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq);
/*
* VIA VT82C598 has its device ID settable and many BIOSes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-10 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-07 13:24 RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 13:53 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-12-07 17:27 ` Bauke Jan Douma
2006-12-07 18:32 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-12-08 15:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 14:38 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-07 14:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 16:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-12-10 4:09 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-10 16:00 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-12-10 16:22 ` Daniel Drake
2006-12-10 22:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-10 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 22:49 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-11 1:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 23:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-11 1:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-11 12:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-19 6:08 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 1:42 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 12:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-11 12:48 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-11 13:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-07 19:54 ` Jean Delvare
2006-12-07 20:45 ` Tomek Koprowski
2006-12-08 15:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-08 16:11 ` RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-12-08 21:02 ` RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16 Brice Goglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061210160053.GD10351@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=bjdouma@xs4all.nl \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=brice@myri.com \
--cc=daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
--cc=tomek@koprowski.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox