* RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?
@ 2006-12-12 23:35 Adrian Bunk
2006-12-13 4:18 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2006-12-12 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jdike; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel, linux-kernel
MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN.
Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all
possible cleanups after this be accepted?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?
2006-12-12 23:35 RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT? Adrian Bunk
@ 2006-12-13 4:18 ` Jeff Dike
2007-07-28 15:47 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2006-12-13 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel, linux-kernel
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:35:33AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN.
>
> Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all
> possible cleanups after this be accepted?
Thanks, but not yet.
I've got that queued up in my tree now, waiting for SMP to work. SMP is
the one remaining justification for TT mode, so I'll get that in, then remove
MODE_TT and do the associated cleanups.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?
2006-12-13 4:18 ` Jeff Dike
@ 2007-07-28 15:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-03 17:31 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2007-07-28 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Dike; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel, linux-kernel
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:18:37PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:35:33AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN.
> >
> > Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all
> > possible cleanups after this be accepted?
>
> Thanks, but not yet.
>
> I've got that queued up in my tree now, waiting for SMP to work. SMP is
> the one remaining justification for TT mode, so I'll get that in, then remove
> MODE_TT and do the associated cleanups.
MODE_TT is still marked as broken and still not compiling...
Will anyone fix it or can it finally be removed?
> Jeff
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?
2007-07-28 15:47 ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2007-08-03 17:31 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2007-08-03 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel, linux-kernel
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> MODE_TT is still marked as broken and still not compiling...
>
> Will anyone fix it or can it finally be removed?
I guess it should finally be removed...
I have a patch which does that - I'll see how easily it moves to the
bottom of my patchset.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-03 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-12 23:35 RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT? Adrian Bunk
2006-12-13 4:18 ` Jeff Dike
2007-07-28 15:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-03 17:31 ` Jeff Dike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox