public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Mike Accetta <maccetta@laurelnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Change in multiple NFS mount behavior in 2.6.19?
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:28:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061215212835.447659c8.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45837A24.9040207@laurelnetworks.com>

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:46:28 -0500 Mike Accetta wrote:

> After upgrading an NFS client from 2.6.18 to 2.6.19 (and also with 
> 2.6.19.1) we see a change in behavior of multiple NFS mounts against the 
> same server (running 2.4.20 in this case).  With 2.6.18 we could mount 
> different pieces of the same remote file system with distinct read-only 
> and read-write attributes at corresponding places on the client.  With 
> 2.6.19 if the first mount is read-only, subsequent mounts seem to 
> inherit the read-only status even though not explicitly mounted read-only.
> 
> If I did the "git bisect" properly, the behavior changed with commit
> 54ceac4515986030c2502960be620198dd8fe25b and the description of this 
> commit seems like it could indeed have caused this behavior, but perhaps 
> not intentionally. I believe the client is making NFS V2 calls. Also, I 
> am still able to issue a "mount -o remount,rw" on the client to regain 
> read-write capability.  Was this a regression or is this now the 
> expected behavior for multiple NFS client mounts in 2.6.19?
> -- 

That would correspond to this bugzilla item, which explains
that multiple mount semantics for one filesystem are all shared.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7655

---
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-16  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-16  4:46 Change in multiple NFS mount behavior in 2.6.19? Mike Accetta
2006-12-16  5:28 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
     [not found] ` <31861.20061215212835.447659c8.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
2006-12-18 17:23   ` Mike Accetta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061215212835.447659c8.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maccetta@laurelnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox