From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Mike Accetta <maccetta@laurelnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Change in multiple NFS mount behavior in 2.6.19?
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:28:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061215212835.447659c8.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45837A24.9040207@laurelnetworks.com>
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:46:28 -0500 Mike Accetta wrote:
> After upgrading an NFS client from 2.6.18 to 2.6.19 (and also with
> 2.6.19.1) we see a change in behavior of multiple NFS mounts against the
> same server (running 2.4.20 in this case). With 2.6.18 we could mount
> different pieces of the same remote file system with distinct read-only
> and read-write attributes at corresponding places on the client. With
> 2.6.19 if the first mount is read-only, subsequent mounts seem to
> inherit the read-only status even though not explicitly mounted read-only.
>
> If I did the "git bisect" properly, the behavior changed with commit
> 54ceac4515986030c2502960be620198dd8fe25b and the description of this
> commit seems like it could indeed have caused this behavior, but perhaps
> not intentionally. I believe the client is making NFS V2 calls. Also, I
> am still able to issue a "mount -o remount,rw" on the client to regain
> read-write capability. Was this a regression or is this now the
> expected behavior for multiple NFS client mounts in 2.6.19?
> --
That would correspond to this bugzilla item, which explains
that multiple mount semantics for one filesystem are all shared.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7655
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-16 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-16 4:46 Change in multiple NFS mount behavior in 2.6.19? Mike Accetta
2006-12-16 5:28 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
[not found] ` <31861.20061215212835.447659c8.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
2006-12-18 17:23 ` Mike Accetta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061215212835.447659c8.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maccetta@laurelnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox