From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:31:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061218193111.GH10316@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612181341090.28308@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 01:46:27PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:41:59AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > Remove the note in the documentation that suggests people can use
> > > "requires" for dependencies in Kconfig files.
> > >...
> >
> > Considering that noone uses it, what about the patch below to also
> > remove the implementation?
>
> ... big snip ...
>
> i have no problem knocking out of the parser anything related to
> "depends" or "requires." in fact, i did note in earlier patch
> submissions that i was just cleaning the Kconfig files but i was
> leaving the parser alone, and someone else was welcome to take care of
> that.
>
> if the kbuild folks are good with this, i certainly have no objection.
>
> rday
>
> p.s. i didn't look closely enough to see if your patch took out
> support for both "depends" *and* "requires". at this point, neither
> of those are necessary anymore -- it's all "depends on" except for
> three remaining Kconfig files.
It takes out only "requires" (as the patch description says).
Whether to remove the plain "depends" (opposed to "depends on") is a
different (and perhaps more controversial) question, but it should
anyway not happen before the last usage is removed.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-18 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-18 16:41 [PATCH] Remove suggestion that Kconfig files can use "requires" to list deps Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-18 18:04 ` [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax Adrian Bunk
2006-12-18 18:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-18 19:31 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-12-18 19:38 ` Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-19 17:53 ` Roman Zippel
2006-12-28 21:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-01 19:08 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061218193111.GH10316@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox