From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Kawai, Hidehiro" <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de,
james.bottomley@steeleye.com, Satoshi OSHIMA <soshima@redhat.com>,
"Hideo AOKI@redhat" <haoki@redhat.com>,
sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: core dump masking support
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:40:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061220154056.GA4261@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061213132358.ddcaaaf4.akpm@osdl.org>
Hi!
> > When a new process is created, the process inherits the coremask
> > setting from its parent. It is useful to set the coremask before
> > the program runs. For example:
> >
> > $ echo 1 > /proc/self/coremask
> > $ ./some_program
>
> The requirement makes sense, I guess.
>
> Regarding the implementation: if we add
>
> unsigned char coredump_omit_anon_memory:1;
>
> into the mm_struct right next to `dumpable' then we avoid increasing the
> size of the mm_struct, and the code gets neater.
>
>
> Modification of this field is racy, and we don't have a suitable lock in
> mm_struct to fix that. I don't think we care about that a lot, but it'd be
> best to find some way of fixing it.
>
>
> Really we should convert binfmt_aout.c and any other coredumpers too.
>
>
> Does this feature have any security implications? For example, there might
> be system administration programs which force a coredump on a "bad"
> process, and leave the core somewhere for the administrator to look at.
> With this change, we permit hiding of that corefile's anon memory from the
> administrator. OK, lame example, but perhaps there are better ones.
User can already ulimit -c 0 on himself, perhaps we want to use same
interface here? ulimit -cmask=(bitmask)?
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-13 7:14 [PATCH] binfmt_elf: core dump masking support Kawai, Hidehiro
2006-12-13 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-18 8:08 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
2006-12-20 15:40 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-01-09 1:07 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-09 14:39 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-12 8:49 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-14 20:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-19 0:40 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-19 0:45 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-22 2:29 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-22 10:06 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-23 4:42 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-23 9:08 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-23 12:17 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061220154056.GA4261@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=haoki@redhat.com \
--cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=soshima@redhat.com \
--cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox