public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: J <jhnlmn@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible race condition in usb-serial.c
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:32:31 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061220193231.39261.qmail@web32911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612201047.20842.oliver@neukum.org>

Thank you for the explanation.

> serial_close is safe because serial_disconnect
> lowers the refcount

Sorry, I meant serial_open, as in my original example.

I am currently trying to fix a legacy 2.4 based USB
driver and I am having various races, 
serial_open/usb_serial_disconnect is the most lively.
I am not asking your help in fixing this old 2.4 junk
(in fact I already fixed it using a global semaphore
to protect serial_table).

But I still want to understand how the latest and
greatest 2.6 driver is supposed to work so I can
adopt some of the changes. At first I thought that
the ref-counting will help, but then found that 
it does not fix much! The race is as lively 
as ever.

Also I found that BKL/lock_kernel is compiled out in
my configuration because it is not an SMP build.

I see that in 2.6 BKL/lock_kernel are also optional
for non-SMP builds. Is it true?
If yes, then again, how this is supposed to work
and avoid races?


Thank you
John


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-12-20 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-19 19:21 Possible race condition in usb-serial.c J
2006-12-19 20:15 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-19 22:33   ` J
2006-12-20  9:47     ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-20 15:10       ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2006-12-20 21:02         ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-20 19:32       ` J [this message]
2006-12-20 20:43         ` Greg KH
2006-12-20 22:39           ` J
2006-12-20 22:52             ` Greg KH
2006-12-20 20:43         ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-20 22:24           ` J
2006-12-22 18:14             ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-22 19:08               ` J
2006-12-22 19:59                 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-22 20:51                   ` J

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061220193231.39261.qmail@web32911.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=jhnlmn@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox