From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/5][time][x86_64] Split x86_64/kernel/time.c up
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:56:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061220225602.0ff3f49e.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061220221003.15178.60219.sendpatchset@localhost>
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:13:37 -0500
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> +
> +unsigned int __init hpet_calibrate_tsc(void)
> +{
> + int tsc_start, hpet_start;
> + int tsc_now, hpet_now;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + local_irq_disable();
> +
> + hpet_start = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER);
> + rdtscl(tsc_start);
> +
> + do {
> + local_irq_disable();
> + hpet_now = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER);
> + tsc_now = get_cycles_sync();
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + } while ((tsc_now - tsc_start) < TICK_COUNT &&
> + (hpet_now - hpet_start) < TICK_COUNT);
> +
> + return (tsc_now - tsc_start) * 1000000000L
> + / ((hpet_now - hpet_start) * hpet_period / 1000);
> +}
What a confused function. If called with local irqs disabled it'll fail to
enable interrupts in that loop. Perhaps that's deliberate, dunno.
Plus local_irq_save() disables interrupts, so the first local_irq_disable()
is not needed.
I will kill the unneeded local_irq_disable() and then shall back slowly away
from it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-21 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 22:13 [PATCH -mm 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64 john stultz
2006-12-20 22:13 ` [PATCH -mm 1/5][time][generic] vsyscall-gtod support for GENERIC_TIME john stultz
2006-12-20 22:13 ` [PATCH -mm 2/5][time][x86_64] hpet_address cleanup john stultz
2006-12-20 22:13 ` [PATCH -mm 3/5][time][x86_64] Split x86_64/kernel/time.c up john stultz
2006-12-21 6:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-12-20 22:13 ` [PATCH -mm 4/5][time][x86_64] Convert x86_64 to use GENERIC_TIME john stultz
2006-12-28 1:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-20 22:13 ` [PATCH -mm 5/5][time][x86_64] Re-enable vsyscall support for x86_64 john stultz
2006-12-21 6:27 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-21 15:42 ` [PATCH -mm 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset " Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061220225602.0ff3f49e.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox