public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Florin Iucha <florin@iucha.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc2
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:37:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061226163713.GA9047@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061226162616.GA6756@elte.hu>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> > I've had at least one more occurrence of it:
> > 
> > [   78.804940] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kbd/0x20000000/3444
> > [   78.804944] 
> > [   78.804945] Call Trace:
> 
> ok, i can think of a simpler scenario: 
> add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE) /twice/, nested into each other.

doh - the BKL! That does a down() in a PREEMPT_ACTIVE section, which can 
trigger cond_resched(). The fix is to check for PREEMPT_ACTIVE in 
cond_resched(). (and only in cond_resched())

Updated fix (against -rc2) attached.

	Ingo

---------------------->
Subject: [patch] sched: fix cond_resched_softirq() offset
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

remove the __resched_legal() check: it is conceptually broken.
The biggest problem it had is that it can mask buggy cond_resched()
calls. A cond_resched() call is only legal if we are not in an
atomic context, with two narrow exceptions:

 - if the system is booting
 - a reacquire_kernel_lock() down() done while PREEMPT_ACTIVE is set

But __resched_legal() hid this and just silently returned whenever
these primitives were called from invalid contexts. (Same goes for
cond_resched_locked() and cond_resched_softirq()).

furthermore, the __legal_resched(0) call was buggy in that it caused
unnecessarily long softirq latencies via cond_resched_softirq(). (which
is only called from softirq-off sections, hence the code did nothing.)

the fix is to resurrect the efficiency of the might_sleep checks and to
only allow the narrow exceptions.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   18 ++++--------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4617,17 +4617,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sched_yield(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int __resched_legal(int expected_preempt_count)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
-	if (unlikely(preempt_count() != expected_preempt_count))
-		return 0;
-#endif
-	if (unlikely(system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING))
-		return 0;
-	return 1;
-}
-
 static void __cond_resched(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP
@@ -4647,7 +4636,8 @@ static void __cond_resched(void)
 
 int __sched cond_resched(void)
 {
-	if (need_resched() && __resched_legal(0)) {
+	if (need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE) &&
+					system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
 		__cond_resched();
 		return 1;
 	}
@@ -4673,7 +4663,7 @@ int cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
 		ret = 1;
 		spin_lock(lock);
 	}
-	if (need_resched() && __resched_legal(1)) {
+	if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
 		spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
 		_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
 		preempt_enable_no_resched();
@@ -4689,7 +4679,7 @@ int __sched cond_resched_softirq(void)
 {
 	BUG_ON(!in_softirq());
 
-	if (need_resched() && __resched_legal(0)) {
+	if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
 		raw_local_irq_disable();
 		_local_bh_enable();
 		raw_local_irq_enable();

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-26 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-25 22:40 Linux 2.6.20-rc2 Florin Iucha
2006-12-25 22:56 ` Florin Iucha
2006-12-25 23:06   ` Trond Myklebust
2006-12-26  1:30     ` Florin Iucha
2006-12-26 10:25   ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-26 12:40     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-26 14:20       ` Florin Iucha
2006-12-26 15:22         ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]           ` <20061226234206.GD22307@iucha.net>
     [not found]             ` <20061226234253.GA7523@elte.hu>
2006-12-27  1:50               ` Florin Iucha
2006-12-26 15:36       ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-26 16:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-26 16:37           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-12-26 17:44             ` Fabio Comolli
2007-01-03 12:33 ` Jiri Kosina
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-24  4:49 Linus Torvalds
2006-12-24 13:58 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-12-24 14:49   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-24 17:13 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061226163713.GA9047@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=florin@iucha.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox