public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: florin@iucha.net (Florin Iucha)
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc2
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:50:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061227015017.GE22307@iucha.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061226234253.GA7523@elte.hu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3400 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:42:53AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Florin Iucha <florin@iucha.net> wrote:
> > I saw your subsequent message and will apply the patch, retest and 
> > report.
> 
> yeah. Just to make sure i've attached the latest and greatest version of 
> the patch - please make sure you have this one applied.

The good news is, with this patch there is no oops.

The bad news is, the USB keyboard is still not functioning, but the
mice plugged in the keyboard hub are working.

One down, one more to go...

florin

> ---------------------->
> Subject: [patch] sched: fix cond_resched_softirq() offset
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> 
> remove the __resched_legal() check: it is conceptually broken.
> The biggest problem it had is that it can mask buggy cond_resched()
> calls. A cond_resched() call is only legal if we are not in an
> atomic context, with two narrow exceptions:
> 
>  - if the system is booting
>  - a reacquire_kernel_lock() down() done while PREEMPT_ACTIVE is set
> 
> But __resched_legal() hid this and just silently returned whenever
> these primitives were called from invalid contexts. (Same goes for
> cond_resched_locked() and cond_resched_softirq()).
> 
> furthermore, the __legal_resched(0) call was buggy in that it caused
> unnecessarily long softirq latencies via cond_resched_softirq(). (which
> is only called from softirq-off sections, hence the code did nothing.)
> 
> the fix is to resurrect the efficiency of the might_sleep checks and to
> only allow the narrow exceptions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
>  kernel/sched.c |   18 ++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4617,17 +4617,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sched_yield(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int __resched_legal(int expected_preempt_count)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> -	if (unlikely(preempt_count() != expected_preempt_count))
> -		return 0;
> -#endif
> -	if (unlikely(system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING))
> -		return 0;
> -	return 1;
> -}
> -
>  static void __cond_resched(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP
> @@ -4647,7 +4636,8 @@ static void __cond_resched(void)
>  
>  int __sched cond_resched(void)
>  {
> -	if (need_resched() && __resched_legal(0)) {
> +	if (need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE) &&
> +					system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
>  		__cond_resched();
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> @@ -4673,7 +4663,7 @@ int cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
>  		ret = 1;
>  		spin_lock(lock);
>  	}
> -	if (need_resched() && __resched_legal(1)) {
> +	if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
>  		spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
>  		_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
>  		preempt_enable_no_resched();
> @@ -4689,7 +4679,7 @@ int __sched cond_resched_softirq(void)
>  {
>  	BUG_ON(!in_softirq());
>  
> -	if (need_resched() && __resched_legal(0)) {
> +	if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
>  		raw_local_irq_disable();
>  		_local_bh_enable();
>  		raw_local_irq_enable();
> 

-- 
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
      http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-12-27  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-25 22:40 Linux 2.6.20-rc2 Florin Iucha
2006-12-25 22:56 ` Florin Iucha
2006-12-25 23:06   ` Trond Myklebust
2006-12-26  1:30     ` Florin Iucha
2006-12-26 10:25   ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-26 12:40     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-26 14:20       ` Florin Iucha
2006-12-26 15:22         ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]           ` <20061226234206.GD22307@iucha.net>
     [not found]             ` <20061226234253.GA7523@elte.hu>
2006-12-27  1:50               ` Florin Iucha [this message]
2006-12-26 15:36       ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-26 16:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-26 16:37           ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-26 17:44             ` Fabio Comolli
2007-01-03 12:33 ` Jiri Kosina
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-24  4:49 Linus Torvalds
2006-12-24 13:58 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-12-24 14:49   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-24 17:13 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061227015017.GE22307@iucha.net \
    --to=florin@iucha.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox