From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2: known unfixed regressions
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:58:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061229125828.GR20714@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061228.205106.130845178.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:51:06PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:36:02 -0300
>
> > Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
> >
> > Add that on SPARC64 boot fails due to missing /dev/root. Vanilla 2.6.19 and
> > 2.6.19.1 work fine, before 2.6.20-rc1 it broke. I checked the initrds for
> > both versions, the only difference "diff -Nur" finds between the unpacked
> > initrds are the modules themselves (obviously).
>
> Did you report this will all relevant details on sparclinux@vger
> so that the sparc64 maintainers can analyze the problem?
>
> I didn't see the report there else I would be looking into it.
>...
I did copy the email to both sparclinux and you when I asked Horst
whether it's still present in the latest kernel, and therefore his
answer that it does the day before yesterday should have reached you.
The thread is "Re: 2.6.19 (current from git) on SPARC64: Can't mount /".
Is there anything I can improve to catch your intention?
Is "reply with fullquote + question + adding Cc's" somehow suboptimal?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-29 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-24 4:49 Linux 2.6.20-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2006-12-24 13:58 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-12-24 14:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-24 17:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-12-25 21:02 ` swsusp testing wanted (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc2) Pavel Machek
2006-12-28 22:31 ` 2.6.20-rc2: known regressions with patches available Adrian Bunk
2006-12-28 22:39 ` 2.6.20-rc2: known unfixed regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-12-28 22:57 ` Greg KH
2006-12-28 23:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-28 23:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-28 23:30 ` Greg KH
2006-12-29 1:36 ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-12-29 4:51 ` David Miller
2006-12-29 12:58 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-12-29 12:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-29 18:07 ` Ben Collins
2006-12-29 19:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-30 1:21 ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-12-30 1:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-29 18:14 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-12-29 19:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-29 20:18 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-12-31 0:47 ` 2.6.20-rc2: known unfixed regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-12-31 9:44 ` Ismail Dönmez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061229125828.GR20714@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox