From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:14:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070102151401.GG2483@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <459A7646.1070007@rtr.ca>
On Tue, Jan 02 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 02 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jan 02 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
> >>>Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Mon, Jan 01 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>>>The patch would appear to need this fix:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c~a
> >>>>>+++ a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> >>>>>@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static int cfq_allow_merge(request_queue
> >>>>> if (cfqq == RQ_CFQQ(rq))
> >>>>> return 1;
> >>>>>
> >>>>>- return 1;
> >>>>>+ return 0;
> >>>>>}
> >>>>>
> >>>>>static inline void
> >>>>>_
> >>>>>
> >>>>>But that might not fix things...
> >>>>Yeah it is, but I don't think it'll fix it (if anything, it'll be more
> >>>>conservative).
> >>>(to possibly save others from trying -- no, doesn't fix any)
> >>As expected. The issue is rq_is_sync(rq) takes the data direction into
> >>account as well, while bio_sync() only checks the sync bit. This should
> >>fix it.
> >
> >And here a little more relaxed version, as Mark Lord suggested. We allow
> >merge of async bio into a sync request, but not vice versa.
> >
> >Both patches pending testing, will do so now.
>
> Performance is right back where it should be now, thanks!
Good, thanks!
> I did have to massage the second patch to get it to apply cleanly
> after the first patch. You may want to regenerate it against -rc3.
Hmm odd, I thought I did. Will double check.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-02 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 13:37 PATA -- pata_amd on 2.6.19 fails to IDENTIFY my DVD-ROM Rene Herman
2006-12-27 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2006-12-27 17:50 ` Rene Herman
2006-12-28 2:24 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-01 22:46 ` 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput Rene Herman
2007-01-01 22:56 ` Rene Herman
2007-01-01 23:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-01 23:28 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 8:34 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 15:01 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-02 17:35 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-02 18:10 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 17:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-02 5:36 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-02 8:44 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 10:24 ` Rene Herman
2007-01-02 11:57 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 12:10 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 15:12 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 15:14 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-01-02 15:40 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 15:45 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070102151401.GG2483@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=rene.herman@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox