From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: [ARM] Regression somewhere between 2.6.19 and 2.6.19-rc1
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:39:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070102163923.GB12902@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
I'm seeing utterly random behaviour from kernels on ARM SMP hardware
built after 2.6.19. I won't bother trying to paste the kernel output;
sometimes the kernel locks solid (no IRQs, no output to say what's wrong).
Other times I get the first line of an oops repeating but with random
addresses. Othertimes the oops doesn't complete.
2.6.19 runs fine.
So I just tried using git bisect to track down the problem. First issue
that presky cmpxchg() causing a build error. Ok, so I provide a version
to get around that.
Next problem:
fs/proc/proc_misc.c: In function `version_read_proc':
fs/proc/proc_misc.c:256: warning: implicit declaration of function `utsname'
fs/proc/proc_misc.c:256: error: invalid type argument of `->'
fs/proc/proc_misc.c:256: error: invalid type argument of `->'
make[3]: *** [fs/proc/proc_misc.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2
make: *** [uImage] Error 2
It seems this breakage seems to have been introduced some 260-odd commits
prior to the point which git bisect wants me to test.
How do I tell git bisect "I can't test this, this is neither good nor bad,
please choose another to try" ? Or is git bisect hopeless given the large
amount of unbuildable commits thanks to our weekly merges?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-02 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-02 16:39 Russell King [this message]
2007-01-02 16:50 ` [ARM] Regression somewhere between 2.6.19 and 2.6.19-rc1 Russell King
2007-01-02 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070102163923.GB12902@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox