public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:22:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070103082202.GG11203@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070103000909.dc70594f.akpm@osdl.org>

On Wed, Jan 03 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed,  3 Jan 2007 08:48:28 +0100
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is a patch to perform block device plugging explicitly in the submitting
> > process context rather than implicitly by the block device.
> 
> I don't think anyone will regret the passing of
> address_space_operations.sync_page().

Hardly :-)

> Do you have any benchmarks which got faster with these changes?

On the hardware I have immediately available, I see no regressions wrt
performance. With instrumentation it's simple to demonstrate that most
of the queueing activity of an io heavy benchmark spends less time in
the kernel (most merging activity takes place outside of the queue lock,
hence queueing is lock free).

I've asked Ken to run this series on some of his big iron, I hope he'll
have some results for us soonish. I can run some pseudo benchmarks on a
4-way here with some simulated storage to demonstrate the locking
improvements.

I don't see 3/4 and 4/4 on lkml yet, I wonder if they got lost.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-03  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-03  7:48 [BLOCK] 0/4 explicit io plugging Jens Axboe
2007-01-03  7:48 ` [PATCH] 1/4 qrcu: "quick" srcu implementation Jens Axboe
2007-01-03  7:48 ` [PATCH] 2/4 qrcu: add rcutorture test Jens Axboe
     [not found] ` <1167810508576-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2007-01-03  8:09   ` [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging Andrew Morton
2007-01-03  8:22     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-01-03 21:50       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-03 22:29         ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 22:34           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-04 14:39             ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-05 22:04               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-04  4:35   ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-05  7:23     ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03  8:31 ` [PATCH] 3/4 qrcu: add documentation Jens Axboe
2007-01-03  9:29   ` Tomas Carnecky
2007-01-03  9:39     ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03  9:41 ` [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070103082202.GG11203@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox