public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>
To: mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, md@Linux.IT
Cc: 404927@bugs.debian.org, 404927-submitter@bugs.debian.org,
	debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: udev/aacraid interaction - should aacraid set 'removable'?
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:57:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070103155749.GT13154@colo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070103104951.GC11745@bongo.bofh.it>

(lkml readers: this concerns a security issue reported to debian by a
user of udev/aacraid. udev gives the aacraid devices the floppy group
because it reports block devices as 'removable'. See
http://bugs.debian.org/404927 for the entire thread).

On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:49:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 03, dann frazier <dannf@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> >  Can you elaborate on what you believe the kernel is doing
> > incorrectly? My first guess would be the setting of the removable
> > flag, but aacraid claims to be setting this to prevent partition table
> > caching - do you believe that to be an incorrect usage?
> Yes, this looks like an abuse of the interface to me.

Ok, let's ask lkml

> > It seems like there is precedence for workarounds for older kernels in
> > permissions.rules, so would it be appropriate to add an override of
> > the default floppy rule for aacraid devices for compatability even if
> > this is a kernel bug?
> There are workarounds for bugs which are going to be fixed, but looks
> like this is going to stay forever...
> Are there other drivers in this situation?

I didn't turn up any otherwise when I was grepping yesterday, but my
search terms may have been too naive. I also checked a machine I had
w/ cciss - it did not have the removable flag set.

I found a message from Mark Salyzyn from last year that suggested this
was more pervasive:
  http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0602.2/1231.html
Mark: Can you identify some of these other drivers?


-- 
dann frazier


       reply	other threads:[~2007-01-03 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200612290952.kBT9qg6h009021@alpha.it.teithe.gr>
     [not found] ` <20061229102959.GB10643@bongo.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <20070103080325.GN13154@colo>
     [not found]     ` <20070103104951.GC11745@bongo.bofh.it>
2007-01-03 15:57       ` dann frazier [this message]
2007-01-03 17:17 udev/aacraid interaction - should aacraid set 'removable'? Salyzyn, Mark
2007-01-05 20:13 ` dann frazier
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-05 21:15 Salyzyn, Mark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070103155749.GT13154@colo \
    --to=dannf@debian.org \
    --cc=404927-submitter@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=404927@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
    --cc=md@Linux.IT \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox