From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932337AbXADJJO (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 04:09:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932339AbXADJJO (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 04:09:14 -0500 Received: from mx33.mail.ru ([194.67.23.194]:2089 "EHLO mx33.mail.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932337AbXADJJM (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 04:09:12 -0500 From: Andrey Borzenkov To: David Brownell Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] OHCI: disallow autostop when wakeup is not available Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:09:08 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Alan Stern , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200701031350.08679.david-b@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200701031350.08679.david-b@pacbell.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701041209.09081.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 04 January 2007 00:50, David Brownell wrote: > On Tuesday 02 January 2007 7:16 am, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > > Is the original problem (OHCI constantly attempting and failing to > > > suspend root hub) supposed to be fixed in 2.6.20? > > > > No. It can't be fixed in the kernel because it is a hardware bug. > > I'm curious though: did older kernels, say 2.6.18, have such issues? Yes. It is hardware problem all right. [...] > > Not just that ... it also fixed the problem where quirk entries > saying "don't even try using remote wakeup" stopped working. > Exactly. I am sorry for being unclear - actually the question was, whether quirks are implemented in 2.6.20 (because I remember them being mentioned before). > Once some pending PPC-related OHCI patches merge (support for > PS3 and other CELL systems), there will be infrastructure that > makes it easier to add quirk entries that say "this board can't > do remote wakeup properly". At that point, we can start to > collect quirks for boards like this one. > OK so this answers the question - it is not yet being implemented. thank you - -andrey -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFnMQ1R6LMutpd94wRAqayAKDQrqfpERc4F5LjqWMQgI6oxqqOmACdH++H r6aDgoAQDw2SHRq+2yLaoyw= =95Oh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----