From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:23:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070105072305.GN11203@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <459C8427.9040704@yahoo.com.au>
On Thu, Jan 04 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >Nick writes:
> >
> >This is a patch to perform block device plugging explicitly in the
> >submitting
> >process context rather than implicitly by the block device.
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Hey thanks for doing so much hard work with this, I couldn't have fixed
> all the block layer stuff myself. QRCU looks like a good solution for the
> barrier/sync operations (/me worried that one wouldn't exist), and a
> novel use of RCU!
>
> The only thing I had been thinking about before it is ready for primetime
> -- as far as the VM side of things goes -- is whether we should change
> the hard calls to address_space operations, such that they might be
> avoided or customised when there is no backing block device?
>
> I'm sure the answer to this is "yes", so I have an idea for a simple
> implementation... but I'd like to hear thoughts from network fs / raid
> people?
I suppose that would be the proper thing to do, for non __make_request()
operated backing devices. I'll add the hooks, then we can cook up a raid
implementation if need be.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-05 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-03 7:48 [BLOCK] 0/4 explicit io plugging Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 7:48 ` [PATCH] 1/4 qrcu: "quick" srcu implementation Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 7:48 ` [PATCH] 2/4 qrcu: add rcutorture test Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1167810508576-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2007-01-03 8:09 ` [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging Andrew Morton
2007-01-03 8:22 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 21:50 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-03 22:29 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 22:34 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-04 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-05 22:04 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-04 4:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-05 7:23 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-01-03 8:31 ` [PATCH] 3/4 qrcu: add documentation Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 9:29 ` Tomas Carnecky
2007-01-03 9:39 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 9:41 ` [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070105072305.GN11203@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox