From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add i386 idle notifier (take 3)
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 02:55:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070105105514.GF10599@frankl.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070103230708.GM20714@stusta.de>
Adrian,
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:07:08AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I am hearing conflicting opinions on this one.
> >
> > Perfmon is a fairly big patch. It is hard to take it as one. I have tried to
> > split it up in smaller, more manageable pieces as requested by top-level
> > maintainers. This process implies that I supply small patches which may not
> > necessarily have users just yet.
>
> There should be a big patchset consisting of manageable pieces, if
> possible all of it in -mm.
>
I have already split up the pieces: generic vs. per-arch. I have also
divided it between modified vs. new files. It becomes harder to go
much beyond that without creating also one patch per modified file.
> > > The unused x86-64 idle notifiers are now bloating the kernel since
> > > nearly one year.
> > >
> > > > > And why does it bloat the kernel with EXPORT_SYMBOL's although even your
> > > > > perfmon-new-base-061204 doesn't seem to add any modular user?
> > > >
> > > Where does the perfmon code use the EXPORT_SYMBOL's?
> >
> > The perfmon patch includes several kernel modules which make use of
> > the exported entry points. The following symbols are exported:
> >
> > pfm_pmu_register/pfm_pmu_unregister:
> > * PMU description module registration.
> > * Used to describe PMU model.
> > * Used by perfmon_p4.c, perfmon_core.c, perfmon_mckinley.c, and others
> >
> > pfm_fmt_register/pfm_fmt_unregister:
> > * Sampling format module registration
> > * Used by perfmon_dfl_smpl.c, perfmon_pebs_smpl.c
> >
> > pfm_interrupt_handler:
> > * PMU interrupt handler
> > * Used by MIPS-specific perfmon code
> >
> > pfm_pmu_conf/pfm_controls:
> > * global state/control variable
> >
> > All exported symbols are currently used. Why are you saying this adds bloat?
>
> Which module uses idle_notifier_register/idle_notifier_unregister?
>
None.
I have no issue with removing the EXPORT_SYMBOL on i386 and x86_64 if you
think that would help.
--
-Stephane
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-05 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 14:05 [PATCH] add i386 idle notifier (take 3) Stephane Eranian
2006-12-21 5:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-21 9:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-12-22 1:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-22 10:07 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-12-23 11:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-03 13:20 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-01-03 23:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-05 10:55 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2007-01-05 13:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-09 10:49 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070105105514.GF10599@frankl.hpl.hp.com \
--to=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox