public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	akpm <akpm@osdl.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] math-emu/setcc: avoid gcc extension
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:07:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070107130726.96973116.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070107195845.GA21829@infradead.org>

On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:58:45 +0000 Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:19:00AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:12:42 +0100 Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > 
> > > There's an extra tab in that last line.  Could you also
> > > please fix the indenting (use a tab, not spaces) -- I know
> > > it was there originally, but since there are only a few
> > > lines in that file like that...  :-)
> > 
> > how's this one?
> > ---
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > 
> > setcc() in math-emu is written as a gcc extension statement expression
> > macro that returns a value.  However, it's not used that way and it's
> > not needed like that, so just make it a do-while non-extension macro
> > so that we don't use an extension when it's not needed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h        |    5 +++--
> > 
> > ---
> >  arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h |    7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- linux-2620-rc2.orig/arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h
> > +++ linux-2620-rc2/arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h
> > @@ -48,9 +48,10 @@
> >  
> >  #define status_word() \
> >    ((partial_status & ~SW_Top & 0xffff) | ((top << SW_Top_Shift) & SW_Top))
> > -#define setcc(cc) ({ \
> > -  partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
> > -  partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); })
> > +#define setcc(cc) do { \
> > +	partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
> > +	partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
> > +} while (0)
> 
> Is there any reason you this shouldn't be an inline function?

That would be OK in theory, so I just tried it.

I don't get the same object files produced with an inline function
(for arch/i386/math-emu/fpu_etc.o), so I don't feel that it's quite
as safe without digging deeping into the .o file and its changes.

The 3 other .o files that use setcc() were the same when using
the inline patch version.

---
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>

setcc() in math-emu is written as a gcc extension statement expression
macro that returns a value.  However, it's not used that way and it's
not needed like that, so just make it a do-while non-extension macro
so that we don't use an extension when it's not needed.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
---
 arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h        |    5 +++--

---
 arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- linux-2620-rc2.orig/arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h
+++ linux-2620-rc2/arch/i386/math-emu/status_w.h
@@ -48,9 +48,11 @@
 
 #define status_word() \
   ((partial_status & ~SW_Top & 0xffff) | ((top << SW_Top_Shift) & SW_Top))
-#define setcc(cc) ({ \
-  partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); \
-  partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3); })
+static inline void setcc(int cc)
+{
+	partial_status &= ~(SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3);
+	partial_status |= (cc) & (SW_C0|SW_C1|SW_C2|SW_C3);
+}
 
 #ifdef PECULIAR_486
    /* Default, this conveys no information, but an 80486 does it. */

      reply	other threads:[~2007-01-07 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-07  6:19 [PATCH] math-emu/setcc: avoid gcc extension Randy Dunlap
2007-01-07 13:27 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-07 18:45   ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-07 19:12     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-07 19:19       ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-07 19:22         ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-01-07 19:29         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-07 19:30           ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-07 19:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-07 21:07           ` Randy Dunlap [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070107130726.96973116.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox