From: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:26:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070107142641.GA30379@deepthought> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070106140459.a6b72039.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 02:04:59PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:34:59 +0000 Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 01:42:32PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > You might remove and re-insert the DIMMS.
> > > Sometimes there are poor contacts if the DIMMS are not fully seated and clicked in.
> > >
> > > The real mystery is the 32 vs 64-bit thing.
> > > Are the devices configured the same way -- ie are they both in IOAPIC mode
> > > and /proc/interrupts looks the same for both modes?
> > >
> > > -Len
> >
> > Too late, I've started memtest-86+. If it seems ok after an
> > overnight run, I'll take a look at /proc/interrupts. How can I tell
> > it is in IOAPIC mode, please ? Google was not helpful for this, but
> > if it's an override, the only things on my command lines are root=
> > and video= settings.
>
> (did anyone ever answer this?)
>
> In IO-APIC mode, /proc/interrupts contains entries like these:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 121218123 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 715259 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 6: 5 0 IO-APIC-edge floppy
> 7: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge parport0
> 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
> 12: 10011272 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 14: 11561548 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> 66: 4525183 0 PCI-MSI libata
> 74: 1711 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb6
> 82: 4 0 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd:usb2, ohci_hcd:usb3, ohci_hcd:usb4, ohci_hcd:usb5
> 98: 101326 0 PCI-MSI HDA Intel
> 106: 17747181 0 PCI-MSI eth0
> 169: 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb9
> 177: 3 0 IO-APIC-level ohci1394
> 185: 15 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb8, aic79xx
> 193: 427962 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb7, aic79xx
>
> If not in IO-APIC mode, lots of those will say "XT-PIC" instead
> of IO-APIC.
>
> > Certainly, it seems likely that the configs could be fairly
> > different in their detail.
>
>
I eventually found it ("Local APIC support on uniprocessors") in
menuconfig. In the meantime, I'd moved my 32-bit activity to a
different box (also athlon64, but a bit faster) and I had one oops
on that. At least, I assume it was an oops - the caps and scroll
LEDs flashed, but I couldn't do anything with MagicSysrq, not even
force a reboot. Ran diff on the various configs, changed to IO-APIC
plus an unrelated change to use libata for the cdrom. The faster box
_seems_ stable (used for a couple of hours, and then for a whole day)
so I'm back on the original problem machine.
Last night I reconfigured the kernel (select X86_UP_APIC, deselect
ACPI_VIDEO [ had been a module ], select ACPI_DEBUG, select PCI_MSI
(had been on in my 64-bit configs), removed some ATA/ATAPI drivers I
didn't need). I was running on the 'old' 2.6.19.1 while I built it,
and again got the flashing LEDs after the build, but nothing logged
although I was able to force a reboot with SysRq b.
I guess that when it does have problems, it is mostly within 30
minutes of booting - otherwise, it can be up all day. So, for the
moment I'm hopeful that changing the config will help, but it will
be several days before I feel at all confident.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-07 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-01 16:01 x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9} Ken Moffat
2007-01-01 16:48 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-01 17:07 ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-01 19:13 ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-01 19:45 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-02 17:25 ` Len Brown
2007-01-02 18:04 ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-02 18:42 ` Len Brown
2007-01-02 19:34 ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-06 22:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-07 14:26 ` Ken Moffat [this message]
2007-01-15 16:29 ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-25 23:56 ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-31 21:36 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-01-31 23:26 ` Ken Moffat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070107142641.GA30379@deepthought \
--to=zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox