public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] reimplement flush_workqueue()
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:31:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070109050104.GA29119@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061229171827.GA158@tv-sign.ru>

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:18:27PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Remove ->remove_sequence, ->insert_sequence, and ->work_done from struct
> cpu_workqueue_struct. To implement flush_workqueue() we can queue a barrier
> work on each CPU and wait for its completition.

Oleg,
	Because of this change, was curious to know if this is possible:


CPU0					CPU1
(Thread0)

flush_workqueue()
					queue_work(W1)	
  flush_cpu_workqueue(cpu1)
    insert_barrier(B1)
      wait_on_completion();
	
					run_workqueue()
					   W1.func();
					     flush_workqueue();
						B1.func(); <- wakes Thread0

The intention of barrier B1 was to wait untill W1 was -complete-. If
W1.func()->....->something() were to call flush_workqueue on the same
workqueue, then we would be returning from the barrier prematurely.

Looks possible in theory. Don't know if it is a practical issue.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-09  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-29 17:18 [PATCH 1/2] reimplement flush_workqueue() Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-09  5:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-01-09 15:55   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070109050104.GA29119@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox