From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751351AbXAILB2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:01:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751349AbXAILB2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:01:28 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:38276 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751351AbXAILB1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:01:27 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] x86_64: re-add a newline to RESTORE_CONTEXT Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:01:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Steven M. Christey" References: <20070109025516.GC25007@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20070109025516.GC25007@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091201.21146.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 09 January 2007 03:55, Adrian Bunk wrote: > RESTORE_CONTEXT lost a newline in > commit 658fdbef66e5e9be79b457edc2cbbb3add840aa9: > http://www.mail-archive.com/kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00559.html I don't think we should add such changes for external patchkits. In general kgdb shouldn't add any patches at all. If the existing hooks are not enough they should submit their changes needed so that it can just work. -Andi