Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update

Daniel Walker
2007-01-25T16:39:33Z

On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 07:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Although, to be fair, I do know that Daniel has future sched_clock
> > related patches that need his cleanups [...]
>
> btw., i dont find those sched_clock() changes really acceptable in their
> present form, and i've pointed out my reasons for that in the past, ~2
> months ago when Daniel last sent his cleanup queue.

I address your complaints .. You said you didn't want sched_clock to
have the underlying clock selectable, and it's not any longer .. You
also said I was adding cycles to the scheduling hot patch which I
addressed , but it's not clear if really needed.

Daniel