From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Hans-Peter Nilsson" <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikael.starvik@axis.com,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 3/5: Updates to SPI and mmc_spi: tx_default, kernel 2.6.19
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:02:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701250502.56467.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701250452.l0P4q76u017140@ignucius.se.axis.com>
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 8:52 pm, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> (Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to LKML or the SPI list. Thanks.)
>
> The SD/MMC SPI-based protocol isn't really duplex. In the
> normal case there's either information transmitted or received,
> not both simultaneously. The unused data is always 0xff; ones.
> Unfortunately, the SPI framework leaves outgoing data for a
> left-out tx_buf just as "undefined"
In current kernels that's actually changed. The value to be shifted
out is now specified ... as all-zeroes, which is what various chips
need to receive, and various (half-duplex/Microwire) controllers seem
to be doing in any case.
If that's an issue -- and MMC-over-SPI needs to specify some other
value -- then please re-issue this patch against 2.6.20, including
the update to the bitbang driver ("reference implementation").
I think a better way to package this would be to define a new
flag for spi->mode, since controller drivers are already supposed
to be checking that to make sure they handle all the options which
have been specified. That flag could work in conjunction with
a byte provided in the spi_device, that would be used instead of
zero. (Some folk have noted that when debugging, it's easier if
the pattern there is neither all-ones nor all-zeroes ... something
that a digital scope will show is easier to work with.)
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-25 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-25 4:52 [PATCH] 3/5: Updates to SPI and mmc_spi: tx_default, kernel 2.6.19 Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-01-25 13:02 ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-01-26 10:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] take 2: (was-kind-of: 3/5 SPI tx_default) 2.6.20-rc6 Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-01-26 23:21 ` David Brownell
2007-01-27 4:21 ` David Brownell
2007-01-27 20:19 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-01-27 20:26 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-01-27 20:59 ` [PATCH] take 3: mmc_spi with SPI_TX_1 2.6.20-rc6 Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-01-28 17:46 ` [PATCH] take 4: " Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-01-27 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] take 2: (was-kind-of: 3/5 SPI tx_default) 2.6.20-rc6 Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-01-27 19:25 ` David Brownell
2007-01-26 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Hans-Peter Nilsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200701250502.56467.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikael.starvik@axis.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox