From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: riel@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] Fair-user scheduler
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:31:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070126060142.GA2487@in.ibm.com> (raw)
Current Linux CPU scheduler doesnt recognize process aggregates while
allocating bandwidth. As a result of this, an user could simply spawn large
number of processes and get more bandwidth than others.
Here's a patch that provides fair allocation for all users in a system.
Some benchmark numbers with and without the patch applied follows:
user "vatsa" user "guest"
(make -s -j4 bzImage) (make -s -j20 bzImage)
2.6.20-rc5 472.07s (real) 257.48s (real)
2.6.20-rc5+fairsched 766.74s (real) 766.73s (real)
(Numbers taken on a 2way Intel x86_64 box)
Eventually something like this can be extended to do weighted fair share
scheduling for:
- KVM
- containers
- resource management
Salient features of the patch:
- Based on Ingo's RTLIMIT_RT_CPU patch [1]. Primary difference between
RTLIMIT_RT_CPU patch and this one is that this patch handles
starvation of lower priority tasks in a group and also accounting
is token based (rather than decaying avg).
- Retains existing one-runqueue-per-cpu design
- breaks O(1) (ouch!)
Best way to avoid this is to split runqueue to be per-user and
per-cpu, which I have not implemented to keep the patch simple.
- Fairsched aware SMP load balance NOT addressed (yet)
Comments/flames wellcome!
References:
1. http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc2/2.6.11-rc2-mm2/broken-out/rlimit_rt_cpu.patch
--
Regards,
vatsa
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-26 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-26 6:01 Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-01-26 6:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] core scheduler changes Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-31 15:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-26 6:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] Track number of users in the system Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-26 14:09 ` [RFC] Fair-user scheduler Kirill Korotaev
2007-01-26 18:52 ` Eric Piel
2007-01-31 15:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-26 18:41 ` Chris Friesen
2007-01-31 15:16 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070126060142.GA2487@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox