Re: + make-good_sigevent-non-static.patch added to -mm tree

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>]

On 01/26, S?bastien Dugu? wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:43:24 +0300 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> wrote:
> 
> > SИbastien DuguИ wrote:
> > >
> > > +struct task_struct *good_sigevent(sigevent_t *event)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct task_struct *task = current->group_leader;
> > > +
> > > +	if ((event->sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID) == SIGEV_THREAD_ID) {
> > > +		task = find_task_by_pid(event->sigev_notify_thread_id);
> > > +
> > > +		if (!task || task->tgid != current->tgid)
> > > +			return NULL;
> > > +	} else if (event->sigev_notify == SIGEV_SIGNAL) {
> > 
> > No, no, we can't use "else" here,
> > 
> > > +		if (event->sigev_signo <= 0 || event->sigev_signo > SIGRTMAX)
> > 
> > because we skip the check above in SIGEV_THREAD_ID case.
> 
>   Right, will fix this.
> 
> > 
> > This way any user can crash the kernel with a minimal effort.
> 
>   Well I tried, no crash, just the signal failing to be delivered.

	sigaddset:

		set->sig[sig / _NSIG_BPW] |= 1UL << (sig % _NSIG_BPW);

This writes to ->sig[event->sigev_signo / _NSIG_BPW] location, so we can
corrupt the memory if ->sigev_signo > _NSIG.

Btw, since you are exporting this function, may I suggest to rename it?
No, I can't suggest a better name :) But "good_sigevent" is a bit confusing
imho.

Oleg.