Re: [PATCH 3/3] lutimesat: actual syscall and wire-up on i386

Ulrich Drepper
2007-01-29T15:07:22Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 248 bytes --]

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> What do you mean by "filesystems cannot support lutimes"? Filesystems
> that don't have on-disk timestamps for symlinks?

Yes.

--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 251 bytes --]