public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Frédéric Riss" <frederic.riss@gmail.com>,
	"Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, artiom.myaskouvskey@intel.com,
	bjorn.helgaas@hp.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EFI x86: pass firmware call parameters on the stack
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:10:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070130111058.db191e07.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170183678.21603.73.camel@funkylaptop>

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:01:18 +0100
Frédéric Riss <frederic.riss@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> When calling into an EFI firmware, the parameters need to be passed on
> the stack. The recent change to use -mregparm=3 breaks x86 EFI support.
> This patch is needed to allow the new Intel-based Macs to suspend to ram
> when run in EFI mode (efi.get_time is called during the suspend phase).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Riss <frederic.riss@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> [As I couldn't find an official maintainer for the linux/efi.h file and
> the file header is quite old, I'm Cc:ing the last 2 commiters.]

Matt normally looks after EFI.

> This patch fixes the issue for x86, but the file is also used by IA64. I
> would have used asmlinkage to force arguments on the stack, but it has a
> special meaning on IA64, thus I used a raw regparm(0) GCC attribute.
> This attribute is documented only for x86, I hope it has no side effect
> on other archs.

hm, this sounds like a fairly serious problem.  Has this been runtime
tested on ia64 and x86_64>



  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-30 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-30 19:01 [PATCH] EFI x86: pass firmware call parameters on the stack Frédéric Riss
2007-01-30 19:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-01-30 19:16   ` Frédéric Riss
2007-01-30 19:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-01-30 20:41   ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-01  2:32     ` bibo,mao
2007-02-01  8:10       ` Frederic Riss
2007-02-02  1:32         ` bibo,mao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070130111058.db191e07.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
    --cc=artiom.myaskouvskey@intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=frederic.riss@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox