From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965333AbXA3NaJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:30:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965341AbXA3NaJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:30:09 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:60391 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965333AbXA3NaH (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:30:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:30:00 -0500 From: Theodore Tso To: James Bottomley Cc: Jes Sorensen , Dave Jones , Sunil Naidu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@intel.com, alan@redhat.com, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, David Miller Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Message-ID: <20070130133000.GC8091@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , James Bottomley , Jes Sorensen , Dave Jones , Sunil Naidu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@intel.com, alan@redhat.com, ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org, David Miller References: <20070125.125121.98861775.davem@davemloft.net> <8355959a0701251646t4b7db48cj862268aad52e8e24@mail.gmail.com> <20070126032849.GB5589@thunk.org> <8355959a0701260704x6aea8141s3d0581fa33c74cf2@mail.gmail.com> <20070126195024.GE14759@thunk.org> <45BE8BF9.6020204@sgi.com> <20070130030430.GA21772@redhat.com> <45BECEB4.6060905@sgi.com> <1170133914.3378.55.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1170133914.3378.55.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:11:54PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > And probably several others I can't remember. Right at the moment, the > organisation and funding for all of these is completely ad-hoc, so if > mini summits are the way to go, it would certainly be better to move > them on to a more templated basis (so anyone wishing to organise one > would know whom to go to for these things). Well, Usenix has offerred to provide logistical support for some mini-summits if anyoen wants to take them up on it. Using some of the sponsorship money from last year, we've proposed to make some hotel conference rooms right before OLS available if anyone wants to do a 10-30 person mini-summit in Ottawa. Is there any interest? - Ted