From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Srinivasa Ds <srinivasa@in.ibm.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
ashok.raj@intel, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Need Help] Cpuhotplug operations on 32-bit mode of xeon-64bit processor crashes the system.
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:30:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070130163049.D32010@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45B47200.6030908@in.ibm.com>; from srinivasa@in.ibm.com on Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:42:48PM +0530
Sorry for my delayed response. I was away on vacation.
What platform is this? what do you mean by crashing? Do you see a
system freeze or oops?
thanks,
suresh
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:42:48PM +0530, Srinivasa Ds wrote:
> I saw cpuhotplug operations on 32-bit mode of xeon-64bit processors
> crashing the system. This happens on latest 2.6.20-rc5 kernel also. Same
> (i386 cpuhotplug code) runs fine on xeon-32bit processors.
> Steps to reproduce.
> ====================
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/online
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/online
> ================================
> dmesg shows.
> ==============
> Breaking affinity for irq 4
> cpu_mask_to_apicid: Not a valid mask!
> CPU 6 is now offline
> =======================
>
> On debugging the problem, I found that problem is not in cpuhotplug code
> but in apic part. Execution of "stale" IPI's by onlined cpus(which we
> offlined earlier) is causing the crash. Now we need to debug,why IPI's
> are reaching the offlined cpu's too.
>
> 1) During the calculation of apicid's, if cpu to which IPI has to
> deliver is not in
> same apic cluster,it prints "Not a valid mask" error and returns "0xFF"
> which means broadcast the IPI's to all cpus(which are offlined too) and
> hence the problem.
>
> 2) I booted the system with maxcpus=2 boot parameter, and tried cpu
> hotplugging on it.
> but still problem recreates(I think there is no concept of apic clusters
> if there are only 2 cpus). Hence it makes me to conclude that problem is
> in delivery of IPI's.
>
> So Iam completely stuck here. Iam not able to move forward in debugging.
> So could someone(may be intel folks) please throw some light on this.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Srinivasa DS
> LTC-IBM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-31 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-22 8:12 [Need Help] Cpuhotplug operations on 32-bit mode of xeon-64bit processor crashes the system Srinivasa Ds
2007-01-31 0:30 ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2007-01-31 4:51 ` Srinivasa DS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070130163049.D32010@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=srinivasa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox