From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Joe Harvell <jharvell+lists.linux-kernel@dogpad.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: ACPI C and P states on Conroe
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:17:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701302017.47599.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45BF81CF.2060801@dogpad.net>
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 12:35, Joe Harvell wrote:
> I am trying to enable all the power saving features I can on my Conroe
> E6600. After much searching on the web, I am a little confused about
> the Linux kernel support for ACPI on the Conroe.
>
> Here is my setup:
> Intel Core2 Duo E6600
> Asus P5-B Deluxe board (Intel P965).
> I am running a Gentoo kernel based on 2.6.19.4.
>
> I have managed to enable EIST using cpufreq with the speedstep-centrino
> driver. But my understanding from browsing the ACPI spec is that this
> is still within C0, i.e. not much power savings.
Right, P-states are effective only when code is executing,
and on this processor (with C1E) will have no effect on idle power.
> Here are my questions:
>
> 1) For P states, which cpufreq driver should I be using? I've heard
> speedstep-centrino is deprecated (but only some aspects of it) that are
> being moved into acpi-cpufreq. But I can't get acpi-cpufreq to load in
> my kernel version.
In 2.6.19 I believe that speedstep-centrino is the one to use.
The transition to acpi-cpufreq happens in 2.6.20.
> Also, I would have thought speedstep-ich would be
> the driver, just based on the name.
Don't use speedstep-ich.
> How do I know (other than trying
> all modules to see which one loads) which one I should be using?
> 2) What kind of support for C1-C3 does the Conroe have? The ACPI spec
> says C2 and C3 require chipset support on the motherboard. Does P965
> have that. Does it matter between boards (e.g. P5B)?
I believe that Conroe currently supports just C1 --
this is true for the ones I have.
Internally it is an "Enhanced C1" called C1E where the voltage is reduced
in C1-- but this is transparent to software, which thinks it is just C1.
You can observe this in
/proc/acpi/processor/*/power
> 3) What versions of the kernel support C1-C3 states? What kernel
> options are germane to this? What libraries/tools are involved?
C1-C3 have been supported for a long time.
2.6.20 adds a few tweaks to use a more efficient implementation,
but you'll not notice a difference on today's desktop processor.
cheers,
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-31 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-30 17:35 ACPI C and P states on Conroe Joe Harvell
2007-01-31 1:17 ` Len Brown [this message]
[not found] <fa.kcyyw0/u0jusCdUVaHf0ecFyj0E@ifi.uio.no>
2007-01-30 23:09 ` Robert Hancock
2007-01-31 0:18 ` Joe Harvell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-30 17:33 Joe Harvell
2007-01-30 22:31 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200701302017.47599.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jharvell+lists.linux-kernel@dogpad.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox