From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Frédéric Riss" <frederic.riss@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:51:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702031151.17220.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170499668.31373.35.camel@funkylaptop>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +#define efilinkage asmlinkage
> +#else
> +#define efilinkage
> +#endif
No ifdefs, this should be somewhere in the headers for the EFI supporting
architectures
But I suspect you could actually get away with just using asmlinkage
(after reviewing the ia64 asmlinkage I think it's ok)
x86-64 when it is ever implemented will always need asm stubs though
because it uses completely incompatible calling conventions.
> +
> +typedef efilinkage efi_status_t efi_get_time_t (efi_time_t *tm,
> + efi_time_cap_t *tc);
I assume you have double checked it actually works? (i vaguely recall some
issues with applying attributes to typedefs). If not you would need
to put them to the declarations.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-03 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-31 4:28 Linux 2.6.20-rc7 Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <45C05150.6000802@agmk.net>
2007-01-31 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-31 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <200702010037.48472.pluto@agmk.net>
2007-02-01 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 0:44 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-01 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 6:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-01-31 17:11 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Fix preprocessor condition Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2007-01-31 17:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-01-31 17:40 ` Josef Sipek
2007-01-31 18:15 ` Linux 2.6.20-rc7 Sunil Naidu
2007-02-01 2:16 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 2:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 3:01 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 3:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 5:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-01 6:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 6:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-01 6:38 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2007-02-01 6:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 20:52 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 21:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 5:49 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-02-03 1:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 2:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-03 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 9:19 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 9:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 9:33 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-03 9:49 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 9:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-03 10:47 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 10:51 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-02-03 10:57 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 11:08 ` Frédéric RISS
2007-02-04 13:13 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-04 14:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-04 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-04 18:18 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-04 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 8:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-05 9:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 0:44 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions (v2) (part 1) Adrian Bunk
2007-02-03 6:06 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 7:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 18:06 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-03 20:43 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 21:00 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-03 21:26 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 22:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 21:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 23:20 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-04 1:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-04 4:44 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-04 5:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 0:47 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions (v2) (part 2) Adrian Bunk
[not found] <19868466.241170405430418.JavaMail.root@lxnaydesign.net>
2007-02-02 8:45 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions Fabio Erculiani
2007-02-02 13:58 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702031151.17220.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic.riss@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox