From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
drzeus-wbsd@drzeus.cx, wbsd-devel@list.drzeus.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: shut up the IRQ mismatch messages (Re: wbsd: IRQ handler type mismatch)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:29:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070206112949.1fc99299.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070206113023.3c845bb2@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:30:23 +0000
Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:16:59 -0600
> Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> > I'm seeing this on bootup on my laptop with recent kernels (currently
> > 2.6.20-rc6-mm3):
>
> The problem is various drivers legally validly and sensibly try to claim
> IRQs but the kernel insists on vomiting forth a giant irrelevant
> debugging spew when the types clash.
>
> Edit kernel/irq/manage.c go down to mismatch: in setup_irq() and ifdef
> out the if clause that checks for mismatches. It'll then just do the
> right thing and work sanely.
>
> For the current -mm kernel this will do the trick (and moves it into
> shared irq debugging as in debug mode the info spew is useful). I've had
> a variant of this in my private tree for some time as I got fed up on the
> mess on boxes where old legacy IRQs get reused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
>
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.20-rc6-mm3/kernel/irq/manage.c 2007-01-31 14:20:43.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc6-mm3/kernel/irq/manage.c 2007-02-06 11:01:00.796928504 +0000
> @@ -372,12 +372,14 @@
> return 0;
>
> mismatch:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
> if (!(new->flags & IRQF_PROBE_SHARED)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ %d\n", irq);
> if (old_name)
> printk(KERN_ERR "current handler: %s\n", old_name);
> dump_stack();
> }
> +#endif
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
hm, well, it's dependent upon dwmw2's
generate-a-spurious-irq-at-request_irq-time patch. Do we want to merge
that?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-06 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-06 3:16 wbsd: IRQ handler type mismatch Robert Hancock
2007-02-06 7:01 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-02-06 11:30 ` [PATCH] kernel: shut up the IRQ mismatch messages (Re: wbsd: IRQ handler type mismatch) Alan
2007-02-06 19:29 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-02-06 19:46 ` Alan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070206112949.1fc99299.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=drzeus-wbsd@drzeus.cx \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wbsd-devel@list.drzeus.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox