Re: dd

Mike Frysinger
2007-02-08T05:56:22Z

On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz> wrote:
> > Check to see if `${CROSS_COMPILE}mkimage` exists and if not, fall back to
> > the standard `mkimage`
>
> Why this can't be done by
>
> PATH=$CROSS_COMPILE:$PATH
>
> in your environment?

because it wouldnt matter ? the tool is called
"$CROSS_COMPILE-mkimage", it isnt $CROSS_COMPILE_PATH/mkimage

> > The Blackfin toolchain includes mkimage, but we dont want to namespace
> > collide with any of the user's system setup, so we prefix it with our
> > toolchain name.
>
> If that matter, `type -path' is bashizm (BloAted SHell), and "blackbox"
> with "dash" (very good `sh' equivalents) will fail. I would recomend to
> use "which" command (btw, Debian has `sh' version of it), if you
> concerned about size and performance.
>
> Nack + proposition to move from `bash' to `sh'.

the script already uses "#!/bin/bash" and the patch doesnt change any
of the existing conventions ... so if you want to rewrite the existing
code to be POSIX compliant, then do so so i can add back in support
for $CROSS_COMPILE-mkimage
-mike