From: "Martin A. Fink" <fink@mpe.mpg.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:02:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702121502.17130.fink@mpe.mpg.de> (raw)
Dear all,
I did some performance tests that made me really wonder:
My Hardware:
Asus P5LD2 board with Intel i945P chipset, ICH7R southbridge
CPU Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 at 1.86 GHz, 2 MB Cache
1 GB RAM
My Software:
OpenSuSE 10.2 with Linux kernel 2.6.18, x86-64 architecture
FreeBSD 6.2
Testdrives:
1. HDD: Seagate ST3250820AS RPM 7200.9, 8 MB Cache, 250 GB, SATA-II
(Harddisk Drive)
2. SSD: Adtron AF25FB, 27GB, SATA Revision 1.0a (Solid State Disk)
What I did:
I wrote blocks of 1 MB size to file. Each 1 GB I made a fsync and took the
time. For those tests with filesystems I wrote files of 1 GB size, otherwise
I just wrote to the raw device.
Results: -1-
Test OpenSuSE(AHCI) FreeBSD(AHCI)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSD(vfat 25GB) 41+/-2 MB/s at 4-10% 15+/-0 MB/s at 2% CPU
SSD(raw 25GB) 26+/-1 MB/s at 4-10% CPU 48+/-0 MB/s at 1% CPU
SSD(ext3 25GB) 39+/-5 MB/s at 10-15% CPU 34+/-0 MB/s at 14% CPU
SSD(ext2 25GB) 42+/-1 MB/s at 10-15% CPU 32+/-0 MB/s at 10% CPU
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test OpenSuSE (AHCI off) FreeBSD (AHCI off)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSD(vfat 25GB) 22+/-4 MB/s at 6-19% CPU --
SSD(raw 25GB) 33+/-4 MB/s at 7-14% CPU 41+/-0 MB/s at 1% CPU
SSD(ext2 25GB) 27+/-6 MB/s at 6-14% CPU --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question 1:
Can anybody explain to me, why writing to a SATA-I device with AHCI consumes
so much CPU time using Linux, while it takes almost no CPU time on FreeBSD
6.2 ? Especially comparing values of writing to the raw device?
Question 2:
Can anybody explain to me, why writing to a solid state disk (a kind of memory
that always has the same constant bandwidth) has such big standard errors in
writing rate using Linux (between 1 to 6 MB/s error) while FreeBSD gives an
almost constant writing rate (as one would expect it for a SSD) ?
Question 3:
Why is writing to a raw device in Linux slower than using e.g. ext2 ? And why
is Linux writing rate much lower (-12.5 % for the best case) compared to
writing rate of FreeBSD?
Question 4:
When writing to the SATA-II HDD Linux is around 10% slower than FreeBSD when
using ext3, but around as fast as FreeBSD when writing raw. Why?
How can I improve the speed of Linux,
Thanks for advices
Martin
PS: part of my testcode:
int fd=open(fileName, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0666);
(void)gettimeofday(&start, 0);
for (long bl=0; bl < blocksPerGigaByte; ++bl)
write(fd, block, blockSize);
fsync(fd);
(void)gettimeofday(&ende, 0);
next reply other threads:[~2007-02-12 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-12 14:02 Martin A. Fink [this message]
2007-02-12 17:04 ` SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD Andi Kleen
2007-02-12 16:27 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-12 18:41 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-12 17:56 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-12 18:17 ` Ray Lee
2007-02-12 19:08 ` Alan
2007-02-12 20:34 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-13 9:34 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-13 11:25 ` Alan
2007-02-13 12:32 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-13 14:47 ` Theodore Tso
2007-02-13 15:03 ` Alan
2007-02-13 17:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-12 23:31 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2007-02-13 9:25 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-13 10:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-13 11:18 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-13 10:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-13 11:27 ` Alan
2007-02-13 11:59 ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-13 19:54 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-02-13 10:16 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2007-02-13 10:29 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-13 12:04 ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-13 12:24 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2007-02-13 12:49 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-13 13:53 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2007-02-12 16:37 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-12 18:19 ` Stefan Richter
2007-02-13 19:09 ` Jeff Carr
2007-02-12 17:42 ` Martin A. Fink
2007-02-15 5:48 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702121502.17130.fink@mpe.mpg.de \
--to=fink@mpe.mpg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox