From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751429AbXBPKQH (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:16:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751358AbXBPKQH (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:16:07 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:48408 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751400AbXBPKQF (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:16:05 -0500 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:15:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Andrew Morton , Natalie Protasevich , "lkml - Kernel Mailing List" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown References: <200702160015.04453.lenb@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702161115.59017.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Allowing the kernel to work on big machines without complicated > and error prone irq remapping logic. How much memory does this use by default? If it's much there should be at least a CONFIG_* to make it smaller. -Andi