From: Jeff Muizelaar <jeff@infidigm.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using sched_clock for mmio-trace
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:40:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070216194059.GF6425@infidigm.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73k5yhg9az.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:02:44PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jeff Muizelaar <jeff@infidigm.net> writes:
> >
> > The question is, what api should I be using? I need something that can
> > be called from inside interrupt handlers, and obviously the more
> > accurate and the lower the overhead the better.
>
> Use do_gettimeofday(). sched_clock() is not for general use
> and only for some very limited use cases and will give you
> unexpected results in several cases.
>
> There are a few cases where gtod is still a little slow, but these
> are being addressed. In many cases it is fast. In some hardware
> it stays slow, but there is not much that can be done about that
> because of the hardware design.
>
> It works fine from interrupt handlers and other strange contexts.
Ok, I'll probably use it then. How does the overhead of calling
do_gettimteofday() compare to doing an mmio read/write over PCI express?
i.e. is it going to be a performance problem if I call do_gettimeofday
for every mmio read/write?
Also, is there any good reason blk-trace doesn't use do_gettimeofday()?
-Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-16 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 1:30 Using sched_clock for mmio-trace Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 16:30 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2007-02-16 17:45 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-16 18:10 ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 18:28 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-16 19:34 ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 21:06 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-16 22:10 ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 22:47 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-17 4:36 ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 18:30 ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 18:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-02-16 19:55 ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 20:03 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-16 21:26 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2007-02-17 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-17 15:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-18 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-16 20:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-16 19:40 ` Jeff Muizelaar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070216194059.GF6425@infidigm.net \
--to=jeff@infidigm.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox