From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: "mdew." <some.nzguy@gmail.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:05:33 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702181705.34231.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cone.1171766339.618918.14587.501@kolivas.org>
On Sunday 18 February 2007 13:38, Con Kolivas wrote:
> mdew . writes:
> > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and
> >> interactivity. It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck
> >> patch is aimed at the desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis
> >> on serverspace.
> >>
> >> Apply to 2.6.20
> >
> > any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20?
>
> Would some -ck user on the mailing list like to perform a set of interbench
> benchmarks? They're pretty straight forward to do; see:
>
> http://interbench.kolivas.org
I couldn't take down any lower power machine for these benchmarks... A lower
power single cpu machine would be better for this. Feel free to throw any
other benchmarks at it.
This core2 duo 2.4 GHz with 2GB ram and 7200 rpm 16MB cache hard drive is not
too discrimanatory, but here are the results (use fixed font to see):
Using 2392573 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.20 at datestamp 200702181608
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.002 +/- 0.00329 0.006 100 100
Video 0.002 +/- 0.00356 0.01 100 100
X 0.007 +/- 0.0819 2 100 100
Burn 0.002 +/- 0.00335 0.005 100 100
Write 0.105 +/- 1.55 35.5 100 100
Read 0.006 +/- 0.00707 0.014 100 100
Compile 0.312 +/- 5.61 135 99.8 99.8
Memload 0.01 +/- 0.037 0.72 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.004 +/- 0.00431 0.017 100 100
X 0.006 +/- 0.00608 0.013 100 100
Burn 0.003 +/- 0.00392 0.012 100 100
Write 0.097 +/- 3.44 144 99.8 99.8
Read 0.005 +/- 0.00523 0.013 100 100
Compile 0.059 +/- 1.2 36.7 99.8 99.8
Memload 0.01 +/- 0.0767 1.85 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.056 +/- 0.379 3 98.4 96.7
Video 0.033 +/- 0.258 2 98.7 97.7
Burn 0 +/- 0 0 100 100
Write 0.051 +/- 0.67 11.2 99.3 99
Read 0.053 +/- 0.384 3 98 96.7
Compile 0.139 +/- 2.29 39 99 98.6
Memload 0.166 +/- 2.25 39 98.1 97.1
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 0.551 +/- 0.553 0.665 99.5
Video 0.594 +/- 0.596 0.656 99.4
X 0.019 +/- 0.317 5.49 100
Burn 179 +/- 186 193 35.9
Write 1.16 +/- 5.87 69.2 98.9
Read 0.876 +/- 0.884 1.31 99.1
Compile 193 +/- 209 499 34.1
Memload 1.11 +/- 1.59 15.3 98.9
Using 2392573 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.20-ck1 at datestamp 200702181542
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.002 +/- 0.00333 0.005 100 100
Video 0.004 +/- 0.0309 0.717 100 100
X 0.008 +/- 0.124 2.99 100 100
Burn 0.002 +/- 0.00339 0.005 100 100
Write 0.03 +/- 0.228 2.99 100 100
Read 0.005 +/- 0.00636 0.017 100 100
Compile 0.041 +/- 0.268 3.06 100 100
Memload 0.31 +/- 4.83 6.3 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.003 +/- 0.00383 0.014 100 100
X 0.008 +/- 0.143 5.99 100 100
Burn 0.003 +/- 0.00383 0.009 100 100
Write 0.023 +/- 0.219 4.57 100 100
Read 0.004 +/- 0.0047 0.017 100 100
Compile 0.027 +/- 0.214 3.73 100 100
Memload 0.015 +/- 0.113 3 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0 +/- 0.000351 0.006 100 100
Video 0 +/- 0 0 100 100
Burn 0 +/- 0.000293 0.005 100 100
Write 0 +/- 5.85e-05 0.001 100 100
Read 0.003 +/- 0.0585 1 100 99.7
Compile 0.15 +/- 1.09 14 97.3 95.6
Memload 0 +/- 0.00105 0.018 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 0 +/- 0 0 100
Video 0.006 +/- 0.115 1.99 100
X 0 +/- 0.00283 0.049 100
Burn 187 +/- 225 270 34.8
Write 1.38 +/- 6.8 99.4 98.6
Read 0 +/- 0 0 100
Compile 205 +/- 246 440 32.8
Memload 0.005 +/- 0.0295 0.282 100
--
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-18 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 10:10 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-16 15:47 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Malte Schröder
2007-02-16 21:35 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Edouard Gomez
2007-02-16 21:45 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Edouard Gomez
2007-02-17 0:53 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-17 1:13 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 2:15 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 michael chang
2007-02-17 3:17 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 17:28 ` michael chang
2007-02-17 18:45 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-17 21:00 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 21:50 ` michael chang
2007-02-17 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-18 0:39 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18 0:41 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-02-18 0:45 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 11:15 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Hugo Vanwoerkom
2007-02-18 2:14 ` 2.6.20-ck1 mdew .
2007-02-18 2:38 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18 6:05 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2007-02-18 6:15 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Rodney Gordon II
2007-02-18 6:20 ` Rodney Gordon II
2007-02-18 16:54 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Ryan M.
2007-02-18 19:00 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Ash Milsted
2007-02-24 12:12 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Fabio Comolli
2007-02-25 4:34 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Gene Heskett
2007-02-25 10:32 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-25 16:33 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702181705.34231.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=some.nzguy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox