public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: "mdew." <some.nzguy@gmail.com>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:05:33 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702181705.34231.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cone.1171766339.618918.14587.501@kolivas.org>

On Sunday 18 February 2007 13:38, Con Kolivas wrote:
> mdew . writes:
> > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and
> >> interactivity. It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck
> >> patch is aimed at the desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis
> >> on serverspace.
> >>
> >> Apply to 2.6.20
> >
> > any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20?
>
> Would some -ck user on the mailing list like to perform a set of interbench
> benchmarks? They're pretty straight forward to do; see:
>
> http://interbench.kolivas.org

I couldn't take down any lower power machine for these benchmarks... A lower 
power single cpu machine would be better for this. Feel free to throw any 
other benchmarks at it.

This core2 duo 2.4 GHz with 2GB ram and 7200 rpm 16MB cache hard drive is not 
too discrimanatory, but here are the results (use fixed font to see):

Using 2392573 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.20 at datestamp 200702181608

--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load	Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None	  0.002 +/- 0.00329    0.006		 100	        100
Video	  0.002 +/- 0.00356     0.01		 100	        100
X	  0.007 +/- 0.0819         2		 100	        100
Burn	  0.002 +/- 0.00335    0.005		 100	        100
Write	  0.105 +/- 1.55        35.5		 100	        100
Read	  0.006 +/- 0.00707    0.014		 100	        100
Compile	  0.312 +/- 5.61         135		99.8	       99.8
Memload	   0.01 +/- 0.037       0.72		 100	        100

--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load	Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None	  0.004 +/- 0.00431    0.017		 100	        100
X	  0.006 +/- 0.00608    0.013		 100	        100
Burn	  0.003 +/- 0.00392    0.012		 100	        100
Write	  0.097 +/- 3.44         144		99.8	       99.8
Read	  0.005 +/- 0.00523    0.013		 100	        100
Compile	  0.059 +/- 1.2         36.7		99.8	       99.8
Memload	   0.01 +/- 0.0767      1.85		 100	        100

--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load	Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None	  0.056 +/- 0.379          3		98.4	       96.7
Video	  0.033 +/- 0.258          2		98.7	       97.7
Burn	      0 +/- 0              0		 100	        100
Write	  0.051 +/- 0.67        11.2		99.3	         99
Read	  0.053 +/- 0.384          3		  98	       96.7
Compile	  0.139 +/- 2.29          39		  99	       98.6
Memload	  0.166 +/- 2.25          39		98.1	       97.1

--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load	Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU
None	  0.551 +/- 0.553      0.665		99.5
Video	  0.594 +/- 0.596      0.656		99.4
X	  0.019 +/- 0.317       5.49		 100
Burn	    179 +/- 186          193		35.9
Write	   1.16 +/- 5.87        69.2		98.9
Read	  0.876 +/- 0.884       1.31		99.1
Compile	    193 +/- 209          499		34.1
Memload	   1.11 +/- 1.59        15.3		98.9


Using 2392573 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.20-ck1 at datestamp 200702181542

--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load	Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None	  0.002 +/- 0.00333    0.005		 100	        100
Video	  0.004 +/- 0.0309     0.717		 100	        100
X	  0.008 +/- 0.124       2.99		 100	        100
Burn	  0.002 +/- 0.00339    0.005		 100	        100
Write	   0.03 +/- 0.228       2.99		 100	        100
Read	  0.005 +/- 0.00636    0.017		 100	        100
Compile	  0.041 +/- 0.268       3.06		 100	        100
Memload	   0.31 +/- 4.83         6.3		 100	        100

--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load	Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None	  0.003 +/- 0.00383    0.014		 100	        100
X	  0.008 +/- 0.143       5.99		 100	        100
Burn	  0.003 +/- 0.00383    0.009		 100	        100
Write	  0.023 +/- 0.219       4.57		 100	        100
Read	  0.004 +/- 0.0047     0.017		 100	        100
Compile	  0.027 +/- 0.214       3.73		 100	        100
Memload	  0.015 +/- 0.113          3		 100	        100

--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load	Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None	      0 +/- 0.000351   0.006		 100	        100
Video	      0 +/- 0              0		 100	        100
Burn	      0 +/- 0.000293   0.005		 100	        100
Write	      0 +/- 5.85e-05   0.001		 100	        100
Read	  0.003 +/- 0.0585         1		 100	       99.7
Compile	   0.15 +/- 1.09          14		97.3	       95.6
Memload	      0 +/- 0.00105    0.018		 100	        100

--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load	Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU
None	      0 +/- 0              0		 100
Video	  0.006 +/- 0.115       1.99		 100
X	      0 +/- 0.00283    0.049		 100
Burn	    187 +/- 225          270		34.8
Write	   1.38 +/- 6.8         99.4		98.6
Read	      0 +/- 0              0		 100
Compile	    205 +/- 246          440		32.8
Memload	  0.005 +/- 0.0295     0.282		 100


-- 
-ck

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-18  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-16 10:10 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-16 15:47 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Malte Schröder
2007-02-16 21:35 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Edouard Gomez
2007-02-16 21:45   ` 2.6.20-ck1 Edouard Gomez
2007-02-17  0:53 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-17  1:13   ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-17  2:15     ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 michael chang
2007-02-17  3:17       ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 17:28         ` michael chang
2007-02-17 18:45         ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-17 21:00           ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 21:50             ` michael chang
2007-02-17 23:47             ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-18  0:39               ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18  0:41               ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-02-18  0:45                 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 11:15 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Hugo Vanwoerkom
2007-02-18  2:14 ` 2.6.20-ck1 mdew .
2007-02-18  2:38   ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18  6:05     ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2007-02-18  6:15     ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Rodney Gordon II
2007-02-18  6:20       ` Rodney Gordon II
2007-02-18 16:54     ` 2.6.20-ck1 Ryan M.
2007-02-18 19:00     ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Ash Milsted
2007-02-24 12:12 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Fabio Comolli
2007-02-25  4:34 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Gene Heskett
2007-02-25 10:32   ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-25 16:33     ` 2.6.20-ck1 Gene Heskett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702181705.34231.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=some.nzguy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox