From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932131AbXBSGV1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:21:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932133AbXBSGV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:21:26 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:2480 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932131AbXBSGV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:21:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:21:21 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Phy Prabab Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question about setting affinity in 2.4 Message-ID: <20070219062121.GA27518@1wt.eu> References: <2fe399760702181802q39e75b42iea7f80124506f169@mail.gmail.com> <20070219043927.GE943@1wt.eu> <2fe399760702182114v33f6825ckef91936c4a28b3f1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2fe399760702182114v33f6825ckef91936c4a28b3f1@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:14:21PM -0800, Phy Prabab wrote: > Willy, > > Thanks for the heads up and patch location. It looks like the guys at > RH seemed to have applied a patch to allow one to set affinity, > however, it might be that it is broken. Guess I will have to contact > the RH people to get an update as to what they did/did not do. You should ensure that the syscall has really been added to the syscall table. Their kernel also has a fully working epoll() implementation, but the syscall is missing from the table. It's a shame because you have to add a 10-lines patch to enable it again ! It may be the same problem in your case. > Thanks! > Phy Regards, Willy