Re: [PATCH 05/44 take 2] [UBI] internal common header

David Woodhouse
2007-02-20T15:33:24Z

On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:22 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> But __be32 will catch the same errors these days because the be/le
> types use __bitwise now, right? So use of the __be32/__be64 types should
> be preferred since it also will work with sparse, I would think.

Does __bitwise work in gcc? I thought it was only for sparse?

--
dwmw2