From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH? net/bridge/br_if.c: fix use after free in port_carrier_check()
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:34:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070220143412.GC155@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18581.1171968296@redhat.com>
On 02/20, David Howells wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> wrote:
>
> > static void release_nbp(struct kobject *kobj)
> > {
> > struct net_bridge_port *p
> > = container_of(kobj, struct net_bridge_port, kobj);
> > +
> > + dev_put(p->dev);
>
> Does this need to be done with the mutex held?
I think no. At least the current code does dev_put() without mutex held.
> And does anything actually pay
> attention to the refcount on dev? I assume not...
I guess net/core/dev.c:netdev_wait_allrefs(), but not sure.
> Should you clear p->dev->br_port before calling dev_put()?
Looks like it is protected by RCU... Anyway the current code does the same.
> Looks reasonable. I like it.
>
> Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Thanks! I'll re-send with a proper changelog later today.
Oleg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-20 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-18 21:43 [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-19 11:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-19 12:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-19 13:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-19 15:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-20 13:25 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-02-20 14:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-19 11:27 ` David Howells
2007-02-19 11:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-19 13:15 ` David Howells
2007-02-19 14:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-19 15:15 ` David Howells
2007-02-19 22:11 ` PATCH? net/bridge/br_if.c: fix use after free in port_carrier_check() Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-20 10:44 ` David Howells
2007-02-20 14:34 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070220143412.GC155@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox