From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: all syscalls initially taking 4usec on a P4? Re: nonblocking UDPv4 recvfrom() taking 4usec @ 3GHz?
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:33:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070220193319.GA8800@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070220184859.GA1949@2ka.mipt.ru>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:48:59PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Likely first overhead related to cache population or gamma-ray radiation.
> If it happens only one (it does in my test), then everything is ok I
> think. Bert, how frequently you get that long recvfrom()?
I have plotted the average time for a single non-blocking UPDv4 recvfrom
call returning 100 bytes, based on the delay I insert between recvfrom
calls, as measured in cycles spent busywaiting.
In theory, this graph should show some slope, perhaps because of the higher
chance of context switches, cache evictions and purging of any branche-prediction
information the CPU might have kept. I'm no expert.
I measure a huge slope, however. Starting at 1usec for back-to-back system
calls, it rises to 2usec after interleaving calls with a count to 20
million.
4usec is hit after 110 million.
The graph, with semi-scientific error-bars is on
http://ds9a.nl/tmp/recvfrom-usec-vs-wait.png
The code to generate it is on:
http://ds9a.nl/tmp/recvtimings.c
I'm investigating this further for other system calls. It might be that my
measurements are off, but it appears even a slight delay between calls
incurs a large penalty.
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-20 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070219231447.GA4400@outpost.ds9a.nl>
[not found] ` <p73d545drx6.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
2007-02-20 16:27 ` all syscalls initially taking 4usec on a P4? Re: nonblocking UDPv4 recvfrom() taking 4usec @ 3GHz? bert hubert
2007-02-20 16:41 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 17:02 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 17:11 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 17:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 11:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 11:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-20 18:42 ` Josef Sipek
2007-02-20 18:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 19:33 ` bert hubert [this message]
2007-02-20 19:40 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-02-20 20:45 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 21:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-20 22:02 ` Rick Jones
2007-02-20 22:17 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 22:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-21 16:25 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-20 22:46 ` Ian McDonald
2007-02-25 10:41 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-25 17:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070220193319.GA8800@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox