From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750802AbXBVDLz (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:11:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751486AbXBVDLz (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:11:55 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:35201 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750802AbXBVDLy (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:11:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:10:47 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Chris Wright , Zachary Amsden , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [patch 18/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Some generic early printk & boot console fixups Message-Id: <20070221191047.8d21acaa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070221205323.842917348@goop.org> References: <20070221205254.169835700@goop.org> <20070221205323.842917348@goop.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:53:12 -0800 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Some generic early printk & boot console fixups > (already sent to lkml). hm, this patch series seems to have gone out of its way to cause problems. This particular (pathetically changelogged) patch is already in my tree, only in a later, much more comprehensive form. Similarly the HVC changes were already in Rusty's stuff and were supposed to be merged by Paulus, but haven't been yet. Can we just drop this one? Does the Xen work actually depend on it?