From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750905AbXBWFas (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:30:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750907AbXBWFas (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:30:48 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:49554 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750895AbXBWFar (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:30:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:29:19 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: input.c: start on release Message-Id: <20070222212919.850ceafe.zaitcev@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Here's a curious code I found in drivers/input/input.c (2.6.21-rc1): void input_release_device(struct input_handle *handle) { .... if (handle->handler->start) handle->handler->start(handle); } Is the above supposed to be this way, or you meant ->stop here? The commit comment says: Input: fix list iteration in input_release_device() It says me precisely nothing about the way it's supposed ot be, sorry... -- Pete