From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: input.c: start on release
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:44:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070223164424.0454e11e.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d120d5000702230706u4e7576du6661ce1b58e058aa@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:06:14 -0500, "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> wrote:
> > void input_release_device(struct input_handle *handle)
> > {
> > ....
> > if (handle->handler->start)
> > handle->handler->start(handle);
> It should be ->start(). You are probably confused a little by the name
> of the function. input_release_device() is called when userspace
> issues ioctl(fd, EVIOCGRAB, 0) releasing (or ungrabbing) the device
> (as opposed to xxx_release(file, inode) type functions that are called
> when last user of a file drops off). In our case we want to give
> handlers a chance to resume their control over device. Right now
> standard keyboard driver uses start method do bring back in sync LED
> state of a keyborad-like device after it was released (ungrabbed).
Thanks for the explanation. I suspect people asked you 100 times before.
I can see why we would want to do this when a grab ends, but why do
we do this on every close of /dev/input/mice? The call path is:
mousedev_release ->
mixdev_release (optional for some majors)
input_close_device ->
input_release_device
Same thing happens upon disconnect, though this is probably harmless,
as the device is gone already anyway.
To tell you the truth, all I really want is to hold a static mutex
across a call to input_close_device(). Can I do that?
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-24 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-23 5:29 input.c: start on release Pete Zaitcev
2007-02-23 15:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-24 0:44 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2007-02-24 16:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-24 19:27 ` Pete Zaitcev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070223164424.0454e11e.zaitcev@redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox