From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (Sparc64) 2.6.20 seems to ignore initramfs
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:35:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702241635.21005.andrew@walrond.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702241622150.16527@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
On Saturday 24 February 2007 15:23, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Feb 23 2007 15:47, Andrew Walrond wrote:
> >
> >I have tracked this down to a broken version of gnu cpio (latest release,
> > 2.7) which was used to create the initramfs archive. Bloody annoying
> > since this has bitten me before! Last time I even sent the maintainer a
> > bug report, and apparently a fix is in CVS waiting for the next release.
> > Ho hum.
>
> Forgot the -c flag, right?
>
No, I use '-H newc' as per the instrucions in
Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.txt. Does -c do the same
thing? [checks man cpio...]
But there is a real bug in cpio 2.7 which can break the archive. Its been
fixed in cpio cvs awaiting the next release.
My report to the cpio ML:
Hello list,
I've been experimenting with large (500Mb) initramfs cpio archives on
linux, x86_64, using cpio 2.7, compiled 64bit with gcc4.1.1.
If I create a cpio archive, then extract it and compare with the
original, I see broken symlinks.
I don't know if the archives themselves are corrupt, or whether the
extraction code is broken, but I guess you guys can work that out.
An example:
root@orac initramfs $ cd rootfs
root@orac rootfs $ find . | cpio -o -H newc > ../rootfs.cpio
857030 blocks
root@orac rootfs $ cd ..
root@orac initramfs $ mkdir tmp
root@orac initramfs $ cd tmp
root@orac tmp $ cpio -i -d -H newc -F ../rootfs.cpio --no-absolute-filenames
857030 blocks
root@orac tmp $ ll ../rootfs/pkg/linux/lib/modules/2.6.19.2/
total 1.1M
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Jan 11 13:39 build -> /pkg/linux/source
drwxrwxr-x 11 root root 4.0K Jan 11 11:14 kernel
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 229K Jan 11 11:14 modules.alias
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 69 Jan 11 11:14 modules.ccwmap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 246K Jan 11 11:14 modules.dep
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 813 Jan 11 11:14 modules.ieee1394map
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 788 Jan 11 11:14 modules.inputmap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2.6K Jan 11 11:14 modules.isapnpmap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 74 Jan 11 11:14 modules.ofmap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 161K Jan 11 11:14 modules.pcimap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 967 Jan 11 11:14 modules.seriomap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 100K Jan 11 11:14 modules.symbols
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 306K Jan 11 11:14 modules.usbmap
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Jan 11 13:39 source -> /pkg/linux/source
root@orac tmp $ ll pkg/linux/lib/modules/2.6.19.2/
total 1.1M
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Jan 12 12:08 build -> /pkg/linux/sourceodules
drwxrwxr-x 11 root root 4.0K Jan 12 12:08 kernel
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 229K Jan 12 12:08 modules.alias
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 69 Jan 12 12:08 modules.ccwmap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 246K Jan 12 12:08 modules.dep
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 813 Jan 12 12:08 modules.ieee1394map
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 788 Jan 12 12:08 modules.inputmap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2.6K Jan 12 12:08 modules.isapnpmap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 74 Jan 12 12:08 modules.ofmap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 161K Jan 12 12:08 modules.pcimap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 967 Jan 12 12:08 modules.seriomap
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 100K Jan 12 12:08 modules.symbols
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 306K Jan 12 12:08 modules.usbmap
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Jan 12 12:08 source -> /pkg/linux/sourceodules
root@orac tmp $
The extra 'odules' is suspiciously like 'modules'...
I am now using version 2.6 with debian patches to 2.6-17, and this works
fine. I've tried making a small test case, but it only seems to occur
with my large (500Mb) root filesystem archives. If I just archive the
modules directory in the example above, the corruption does not occur.
Anyhow; if I can do anything to chase this down further, let me know. I
have joined the ML.
Andrew Walrond
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-24 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-23 11:08 (Sparc64) 2.6.20 seems to ignore initramfs Andrew Walrond
2007-02-23 13:32 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2007-02-23 14:46 ` Andrew Walrond
2007-02-23 15:17 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2007-02-23 15:47 ` Andrew Walrond
2007-02-24 15:23 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-02-24 16:35 ` Andrew Walrond [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702241635.21005.andrew@walrond.org \
--to=andrew@walrond.org \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox