From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, bunk@stusta.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: bug in kernel 2.6.21-rc1-git1: conventional floppy drive cannot be mounted without hanging up the whole system
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:34:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070226163429.GL26583@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702260741040.12485@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:51:19AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Commit: 2ff2d3d74705d34ab71b21f54634fcf50d57bdd5
> > Author: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com> Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:26:22 +0100
> >
> > [PATCH] i386: add idle notifier
>
> Interesting. It doesn't touch floppy at all, but it *does* seem to play
> around with irq state.
Side note: this patch adds several function calls (4), several additional
L1 cache touches and a generally inefficient code path to *every single
interrupt that exits from the idle poll*, not to mention the extra (useless,
as it doesn't get used on 99.9% of deployed systems) function call and cache
touches to every single interrupt. Keep in mind that systems acting as
routers will often be sitting in the idle loop when processing interrupts.
At the very least this overhead (which is noticable on profiles) should be
configurable. I don't think that my 586 class embedded routers really need
this crap to be going into the kernel.
-ben
--
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <zyntrop@kvack.org>.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-26 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-24 17:54 bug in kernel 2.6.21-rc1-git1: conventional floppy drive cannot be mounted without hanging up the whole system Uwe Bugla
2007-02-24 18:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-24 18:29 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-02-24 19:23 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-02-24 19:49 ` Ray Lee
2007-02-26 10:38 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-02-26 15:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-02-26 15:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-26 16:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-02-26 16:34 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2007-02-26 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-26 17:45 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-02-26 17:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-02-26 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-25 18:29 Uwe Bugla
2007-02-25 21:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-02-26 3:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-02-26 18:06 Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-26 18:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-26 20:55 ` Rene Herman
2007-02-26 21:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-28 2:42 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-28 13:04 ` Alan
2007-02-28 12:20 ` Rene Herman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070226163429.GL26583@kvack.org \
--to=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox