public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linux Netdev" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Networking" <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sky2 stable in 2.6.12-rc1 (but still performance problem)...
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:56:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070227095644.46d24054@freekitty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6278d2220702270331k7b91017ds4c0eb0be4e4e9697@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:31:58 +0000
"Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
> 
> 2.6.21-rc1 is the first kernel where my SysKonnect Yukon 2 hardware
> with the sky2 v1.13 driver is stable under moderate load. Before a few
> GBs of data going over my GigE network quickly with NFSv4 would cause
> transmit timeouts previously, but now fine.
> 
> I am still observing a performance problem - feels like a wmb() or
> some buffer flushing is missing somewhere - disabling processor clock
> scaling reduces the problem a bit, but does not eliminate it.

That seems odd, if it was a missing barrier you would see data corruption.
Are there checksum errors?

You might be seeing hardware flow control. Look at ethtool -S eth0 output.
Previously, transmit flow control was broken

> What are your preferred way of checking performance? I think that the
> TCP send window can grow enough even if ACKs are delayed due to this
> problem, such that TCP does not immediately demonstrate this issue. I
> could restrict the window scaling factor, so it would be bound by the
> data->ACK round-trip latency, which /should/ be low, but I've been
> observing it higher. Maybe I try this.

iperf is easiest.

> I'll see what I get with iperf UDP also, since this shows min, max,
> avg UDP packet latency IIRC.
> 
> Thanks for your great work so far though!
>   Dan


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2007-02-27 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-27 11:31 sky2 stable in 2.6.12-rc1 (but still performance problem) Daniel J Blueman
2007-02-27 17:56 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070227095644.46d24054@freekitty \
    --to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox