public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: eranian@hpl.hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	ak@suse.de, tony.luck@intel.com,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: debug registers and fork
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:24:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070227122427.bf23af2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070226235154.GB19630@frankl.hpl.hp.com>

> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:51:54 -0800 Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have come across an issue with a monitoring using the
> hardware debug registers on ia64/i386/x86-64.
> 
> It seems that the way debug registers are inherited across fork
> differs between ia-64 and i386/x86-64. On ia-64, the debug registers
> are NEVER inherited in the child. The copy_thread() routine clears
> the necessary thread flags to avoid reloading the debug registers in
> the child.
> 
> Now, on x86-64, it appears that the TIF_DEBUG flag is inherited via
> setup_thread_stack(). By virtue of dup_task_struct() the debug registers
> get copied into the child task on fork. So the child has active breakpoints,
> unless I am mistaken somewhere.
> 
> Given the way the ptrace() interface works, I would tend to
> think that the ia-64 way is the correct one. Any comment?
> 
> Furthermore, on i386/x86-64, when switching out from a task with TIF_DEBUG
> enabled to another which does not, it seems we do not clear the debug
> registers (at least dr7) so they become inactive.
> 

Let's cc Roland - he's totally rewritten ptrace and probably knows this
stuff.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-27 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-26 23:51 debug registers and fork Stephane Eranian
2007-02-27 20:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-02-28 21:25   ` Roland McGrath
2007-03-01  0:01     ` Alan Stern
2007-03-01  0:27       ` Stephane Eranian
2007-03-05 17:25 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-05 20:05   ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070227122427.bf23af2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox