From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964983AbXCALeP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:34:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964988AbXCALeP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:34:15 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:58078 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964983AbXCALeO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:34:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:27:00 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: Pavel Machek , Theodore Tso , Linus Torvalds , Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Zach Brown , "David S. Miller" , Suparna Bhattacharya , Davide Libenzi , Jens Axboe , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3 Message-ID: <20070301112700.GA897@elte.hu> References: <20070227115221.GJ8154@thunk.org> <20070227121116.GA31597@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070228161413.GA4319@ucw.cz> <20070301081808.GD7217@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070301092634.GB20171@elf.ucw.cz> <20070301094723.GJ7217@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070301095402.GA14603@elte.hu> <20070301105928.GA15709@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070301110022.GA28260@elte.hu> <20070301111629.GA27381@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070301111629.GA27381@2ka.mipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > I've uploaded them to: > > http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/archive/kevent/evserver_epoll.c > http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/archive/kevent/evserver_kevent.c thanks. > I also changed client socket to nonblocking mode with the same result > in epoll server. [...] what does this mean exactly? Did you change this line in evserver_epoll.c: //fcntl(cs, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK); to: fcntl(cs, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK); and the result was the same? Ingo